Symbol of the Biosphere, the logo of the Biosphere Institute was designed to acknowledge that humans belong to this singular organism.
List of data         Methodology         Legal limit for radiation dose

Possible Impact on Greifswald (DEU)

GoogleEarth202104
Żarnowiec-Kopalino, Poland, pressurized water reactor (PWR) in project, 3415 megawatts thermal (MWth)

Maps of Individual committed effective doses received by inhabitants during the passage of the radioactive cloud (inhalation):
1° Each row of the table represents a different meteorological situation.
2° The hyperlink enables access to the related map.

Greifswald (DEU)

Maps visible with free Google Earth software! Alternatively, after downloading a map file in KML format, go to google.com/earth/, launch Google Earth, click on "project" then on "open"!
Rank, NPP code, date mSv
1        ZA2_2020-09-29 45.75
2        ZA2_2018-11-26 22.34
3        ZA2_2020-04-21 21.29
4        ZA2_2020-04-22 17.41
5        ZA2_2018-12-13 17.04
6        ZA2_2020-10-01 15.62
7        ZA2_2020-08-11 15.11
8        ZA2_2018-03-03 14.28
9        ZA2_2018-04-09 14.13
10        ZA2_2018-04-11 13.56
11        ZA2_2020-07-18 13.44
12        ZA2_2018-05-26 13.27
13        ZA2_2017-02-06 12.83
14        ZA2_2018-03-01 12.81
15        ZA2_2018-05-24 11.93
16        ZA2_2020-08-12 11.45
17        ZA2_2018-07-11 11.10
18        ZA2_2020-06-17 9.82
19        ZA2_2018-04-10 8.57
20        ZA2_2017-05-05 8.00
21        ZA2_2020-03-22 6.37
22        ZA2_2018-03-17 6.13
23        ZA2_2017-05-03 6.11
24        ZA2_2017-07-25 5.65
25        ZA2_2018-09-06 5.22
26        ZA2_2020-06-12 5.22
27        ZA2_2018-09-02 4.49
28        ZA2_2018-04-15 4.44
29        ZA2_2018-05-07 3.95
30        ZA2_2018-11-25 3.85
31        ZA2_2020-07-17 3.74
32        ZA2_2020-06-03 3.66
33        ZA2_2018-07-10 3.62
34        ZA2_2018-03-02 3.55
35        ZA2_2018-11-03 3.48
36        ZA2_2017-11-30 3.42
37        ZA2_2018-05-20 3.30
38        ZA2_2020-06-16 3.27
39        ZA2_2018-06-27 3.20
40        ZA2_2020-08-13 3.18
41        ZA2_2018-05-31 2.98
42        ZA2_2018-11-24 2.90
43        ZA2_2018-05-12 2.87
44        ZA2_2018-03-16 2.85
45        ZA2_2018-11-27 2.85
46        ZA2_2017-04-30 2.84
47        ZA2_2020-09-27 2.74
48        ZA2_2018-11-19 2.71
49        ZA2_2018-07-27 2.63
50        ZA2_2020-05-20 2.58
51        ZA2_2017-10-23 2.53
52        ZA2_2017-02-07 2.34
53        ZA2_2018-07-09 2.34
54        ZA2_2018-06-09 2.03
55        ZA2_2020-09-30 2.01
56        ZA2_2020-03-23 1.90
57        ZA2_2017-07-24 1.78
58        ZA2_2018-10-29 1.76
59        ZA2_2020-08-08 1.73
60        ZA2_2018-06-25 1.71
61        ZA2_2018-02-18 1.55
62        ZA2_2018-06-01 1.55
63        ZA2_2018-02-22 1.34
64        ZA2_2018-03-07 1.27
65        ZA2_2018-01-08 1.24
66        ZA2_2020-07-16 1.08
67        ZA2_2018-05-25 1.06
68        ZA2_2020-09-26 1.05
69        ZA2_2020-06-13 1.03
70        ZA2_2017-08-10 1.00
71        ZA2_2018-03-30 0.91
72        ZA2_2018-02-26 0.84
73        ZA2_2018-03-15 0.82
74        ZA2_2020-09-18 0.77
75        ZA2_2018-07-31 0.75
76        ZA2_2018-03-31 0.72
77        ZA2_2017-05-04 0.67
78        ZA2_2018-04-12 0.66
79        ZA2_2020-09-25 0.66
80        ZA2_2018-09-05 0.65
81        ZA2_2018-05-21 0.63
82        ZA2_2017-11-06 0.60
83        ZA2_2018-02-05 0.58
84        ZA2_2020-06-25 0.54
85        ZA2_2017-04-29 0.52
86        ZA2_2018-05-08 0.50
87        ZA2_2020-08-10 0.49
88        ZA2_2017-08-11 0.47
89        ZA2_2020-08-26 0.46
90        ZA2_2017-03-06 0.43
91        ZA2_2017-04-16 0.41
92        ZA2_2020-02-25 0.40
93        ZA2_2020-06-19 0.40
94        ZA2_2017-06-29 0.37
95        ZA2_2018-02-27 0.37
96        ZA2_2018-05-23 0.37
97        ZA2_2018-10-28 0.37
98        ZA2_2018-03-27 0.24
99        ZA2_2018-01-03 0.08
100        ZA2_2018-03-14 0.07
101        ZA2_2017-01-01 0.00

PRECISIONS:
1° The radioactivity comes from the passage of the cloud in the hours following an accident;
2° The above individual doses do not include soil irradiation or ingestion of contaminated food after the passage of the cloud;
3° These figures are estimates;
4° SEE COMMENTARY ON LOW AND HIGH DOSES.

5° The calculations are not derived using the map in the illustration, but from another map – of the same format as the one for download on our website to study deposition – which explains some discrepancies between the figure and its illustration.
6° The analysis of the 11 situations producing the maximum fallout allows us to establish the highest risk for a given city, i.e., the consequences of weather situations occurring in 1% of the cases.
7° The above data allow for the identification of the meteorological conditions that would have the worst impact on the area in question, as well as those that would keep radioactivity away. In the event of a major accident at the nuclear power plant concerned, a quick comparison of this analysis with the then prevailing meteorological conditions could be very useful to act as decentralized as possible; local authorities could keep these analyses as ready references to better and more rapidly deploy population protection strategies.

Potential impact of Żarnowiec-Kopalino on the following towns and cities:         Białystok (POL)         Bydgoszcz (POL)         Gdańsk (POL)         Gdynia (POL)         Gorzów Wielkopolski (POL)         Koszalin (POL)         Łódź (POL)         Olsztyn (POL)         Poznań (POL)         Szczecin (POL)         Warszawa (POL)         København (DNK)         Rønne (Bornholm) (DNK)         Anklam (DEU)         Bergen auf Rügen (DEU)         Berlin (DEU)         Frankfurt (Oder) (DEU)         Greifswald (DEU)         Neubrandenburg (DEU)         Rostock (DEU)         Schwedt (DEU)         Hamburg (DEU)         Kaliningrad (RUS)         Kaunas (LTU)         Klaipėda (LTU)         Kalmar (SWE)         Malmö (SWE)         Växjö (SWE)         Visby (Gotland) (SWE)         Stockholm (SWE)

Wikimedia map with modifications
Towns in the vicinity of Żarnowiec-Kopalino


See the details of the radioactive release taken into account for this plant (pdf)

Potential impact of Żarnowiec-Kopalino on the following towns and cities:         Białystok (POL)         Bydgoszcz (POL)         Gdańsk (POL)         Gdynia (POL)         Gorzów Wielkopolski (POL)         Koszalin (POL)         Łódź (POL)         Olsztyn (POL)         Poznań (POL)         Szczecin (POL)         Warszawa (POL)         København (DNK)         Rønne (Bornholm) (DNK)         Anklam (DEU)         Bergen auf Rügen (DEU)         Berlin (DEU)         Frankfurt (Oder) (DEU)         Greifswald (DEU)         Neubrandenburg (DEU)         Rostock (DEU)         Schwedt (DEU)         Hamburg (DEU)         Kaliningrad (RUS)         Kaunas (LTU)         Klaipėda (LTU)         Kalmar (SWE)         Malmö (SWE)         Växjö (SWE)         Visby (Gotland) (SWE)         Stockholm (SWE)

The following maps give a brief overview of different situations and zoom function possibilities when maps are opened with Google Earth. They were generated with NOAA Hysplit software.
Żarnowiec-Kopalino (3415 MWth): 72h simulation starting on 23-04-2020
Żarnowiec-Kopalino (3415 MWth): 72h simulation starting on 16-07-2020
Żarnowiec-Kopalino (3415 MWth): 72h simulation starting on 18-09-2020